babyselling.com Blog

Any contested Adoption is a bad Adoption!

March 13th, 2008

http://www.beyondbabytamia.blogspot.com/

No moral or Ration human being can actually argue that what the “Adoption Center of Choice” does is right.

They already know that someone is going to get badly hurt in the process when they start the manipulation.

Can we argue that the mother of baby Tamia got what she deserved when they wouldn’t give her child back or that the adoptive parents were treated right when the courts finally undid the adoption?

These agencies are flying women around knowing it is going to be trouble. Larry Jenkins knew about my local paternity case, we discussed it on the phone prior to my daughter’s birth. The Facilitators(Jennalee Ryan’s Silver Spoon) were told “I would fight the case fully in court.”

Unlike the baby Tamia case I never relinquished custody at all and consistantly opposed the legal adoption of my child. Where is the constitutional Equal Protection for fathers.

The law is supposed to be blind when it comes to race, gender, social status, orientation and religion, and so on when it comes to all Laws! This is called the “Equal Protection Clause” in the US Constitution. Baby Tamia’s mother flew to Utah, gave up her baby, signed a release form left Utah and let a considerable amount of time pass and she still got her child back. Budy Pruitt never signed any releases and consistantly opposed any adoption and still lost his child forever? How is that?

Buddy Pruitt is a white male. That puts three strikes of Injustice against him. One men aren’t supposed to raise babies. Also white Males have no special victim status and therefore virtually nobody wants to support them in these cases. Thirdly every reputable source on the darkside of adoption tells me that white babies bring in more money.

Eula McNulty a black woman had Mary Mitchell, a Sun Times Reporter go to bat for her. Honestly I’m happy for her but every time I read her case I see how much less deserving she is than people who have consistantly opposed their kids adoptions and never surrendered their children. Especially Legally never signed a legal document waiving their rights! If Cody O’dea or Mathiew Tennison went temporarily insane and signed a waiver giving up their kids and then months later fought for their kids would they have a stones chance in hell! No they wouldn’t!
The case of Baby Tamia and Eula McNulty shows that Utah law not only bends but it totally collapses under outside pressure and scrutiny. Under Utah’s whacky adoption code she had no rights to her child whatsoever. It was bad for business to go ahead with that Adoption with the Illinois newspapers, legislators and civil right groups looking at it. There is really no strong ethic’s of law in the Utah courts as far I can tell -and I think this case proves it beyond any reasonable doubt.

This article http://www.beyondbabytamia.blogspot.com/ and others claim that Utah’s appeals courts have been stacked in favor of the Adoption Business through the lobbying efforts. Other Sources and people I have talked to claim that the Juvenile Judges accept bribes, and that Utah’s courts can be extremely corrupt, and that aspects of the LDS church is corrupt itself. In most cases if the father does whatever is necessary to protect his rights the court finds discretionary power to revoke those rights if at all possible. Simultaneously if it gets to the point where the law plainly states that the parent has no rights they are terminated immediatly.

Since there is no Justice in Utah they shouldn’t be allowed to have Jurisdiction anything whatsoever. Especially anything to do with the welfare of children.

Yet US courts allow them to take children over the consent of parents who both reside out of state?

How can Utah’s biased pro-Adoption courts legally supercede the Jurisdiction of a prebirth custody case in the state of conception and residence of both parents? With the Utah lawyers directing the movement of the mothers only to move the jurisdiction of the adoption there?

How do you explain case after case after case of white fathers doing everything they can to keep their children and still losing them. While a Black Woman can sign away her child and undo the adoption months later? That doesn’t seem like Equal protection …

I’m not playing the race card just pointing out that the nature of adoption is racism, sexism, and classism. It’s not the all seeing eye of God they fear but normal people. They certainly do very bad things!

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized